In low-data structure-activity prediction, the choice of molecular representation can matter more than the choice of predictor, and tabular foundation models sharpen that effect. We ask whether a portfolio of compact, semantically named descriptor blocks can reach the accuracy of a 2048-dimensional CheMeleon embedding while staying auditable at the feature level, meaning that every input dimension carries a model name and a recorded training provenance. Starting from a fixed 11-dimensional physicochemical base, we greedily concatenate provenance-screened blocks using the labelled context alone. Across nine ADME/Tox assays and 50 evaluation cells, scored on common-coverage subsets restricted to the molecules that every representation covers, the portfolio reaches a mean test AUC of 0.762, against 0.764 for CheMeleon and 0.756 for Mordred. The pooled gap to CheMeleon is +0.003 AUC (task-bootstrap 95% CI [-0.020, +0.030]), which satisfies our predeclared pooled parity gate but not the per-assay gate. At 25 context labels the headline rule again satisfies the pooled gate; at 10 labels it does not. We also report four predeclared candidate-selection rules that we falsified. Post-freeze checks over ten seeds and three previously unseen assays support pooled competitiveness for compact, auditable representations; a same-width random-bundle control does not establish that greedy membership itself adds accuracy. Assay-level differences remain unresolved.